2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

A place to post & discuss upcoming events. IPRA or other events welcomed.
Public Read

Moderator: Moderators

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#21  Postby TwinTurbo » Fri May 06, 2016 7:50 am

FatBoy wrote:Bit rich trying to blame Ray or Rolf for that one...
And i hate agreeing with Gary !

I have no problem agreeing with you Paul :lol: :lol: :lol:


Cheers
Gary
User avatar
TwinTurbo
You've got to be kidding, how many posts?
 
Posts: 10461
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 11:46 am
Location: Sydney

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#22  Postby mikrace » Fri May 06, 2016 9:30 am

FatBoy wrote:Bit rich trying to blame Ray or Rolf for that one...

And i hate agreeing with Gary !


Well thats fine. You can think its ok for a car miles out in front to risk what eventually did happen. Me, i would have rolled out of it and cruised behind them. He was closing at a 50kph difference and on the far right side of the track. I doubt the BMW saw him at all. Especially since he would have been looking for the rx7, not the leader closing that fast.

Yes, all the footage looked like he turned in front of Ray, and he may have done. Unless it was done on purpose to 'block' a car he did see, then it is easily a rookie error that could have been avoided by the far more experienced driver, who was not racing anyone.

I think you old timers forget where you came from sometimes........
Michael Hazelton
0404 051 926

TwinTurbo wrote:posting on here about it will achieve exactly nothing.
User avatar
mikrace
forum freak
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:09 pm
Location: Queanbeyan

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#23  Postby TwinTurbo » Fri May 06, 2016 9:45 am

The problem is Rolf moved over/allowed room to be overtaken, with the same closing speeds, and I don't think it's unreasonable for the over taker to expect the same to happen with the car next in the queue. I seem to remember this conversation was about "newbies" and this is a perfect example.


Cheers
Gary
User avatar
TwinTurbo
You've got to be kidding, how many posts?
 
Posts: 10461
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 11:46 am
Location: Sydney

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#24  Postby mikrace » Fri May 06, 2016 11:04 am

TwinTurbo wrote:The problem is Rolf moved over/allowed room to be overtaken, with the same closing speeds, and I don't think it's unreasonable for the over taker to expect the same to happen with the car next in the queue. I seem to remember this conversation was about "newbies" and this is a perfect example.


Cheers
Gary


This statement is infuriating to me and I have no words that are not nasty... so I wont say anything. I hope Bathurst goes great for everyone that gets a spot in 2017.

Good luck with your campaign to get new comers to the class Gary.
Michael Hazelton
0404 051 926

TwinTurbo wrote:posting on here about it will achieve exactly nothing.
User avatar
mikrace
forum freak
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:09 pm
Location: Queanbeyan

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#25  Postby RX4some » Fri May 06, 2016 11:57 am

mikrace wrote:
FatBoy wrote:Bit rich trying to blame Ray or Rolf for that one...

And i hate agreeing with Gary !


Well thats fine. You can think its ok for a car miles out in front to risk what eventually did happen. Me, i would have rolled out of it and cruised behind them. He was closing at a 50kph difference and on the far right side of the track. I doubt the BMW saw him at all. Especially since he would have been looking for the rx7, not the leader closing that fast.

Yes, all the footage looked like he turned in front of Ray, and he may have done. Unless it was done on purpose to 'block' a car he did see, then it is easily a rookie error that could have been avoided by the far more experienced driver, who was not racing anyone.

I think you old timers forget where you came from sometimes........





From where i was sitting, right in the drivers seat, coming onto conrod my car Jumped out of 4th and the BMW passed me and was pulling away, we had blue flags going all the way down conrod, I looked in the mirror and saw Hislop closing in fast with lights ablaze, lifted off and let him through, what Andrew saw or did is up to his recollection, but the chaos occurred and Im out for the year with a busted car,

On a lighter note, the support and offers of help I have had since this happened has been overwhelming, thank you to all those people.
Opinions are like a Momus, everyones got one !!!!
User avatar
RX4some
forum freak
 
Posts: 1870
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 5:06 pm
Location: red hill

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#26  Postby TwinTurbo » Fri May 06, 2016 12:13 pm

RX4some wrote:From where i was sitting, right in the drivers seat, coming onto conrod my car Jumped out of 4th and the BMW passed me and was pulling away, we had blue flags going all the way down conrod, I looked in the mirror and saw Hislop closing in fast with lights ablaze, lifted off and let him through, what Andrew saw or did is up to his recollection, but the chaos occurred and Im out for the year with a busted car

Good point Rolf, blue flags and headlights on :idea:


On a lighter note, the support and offers of help I have had since this happened has been overwhelming, thank you to all those people.
Which is what IP is all about =D> =D> =D>

Cheers
Gary
User avatar
TwinTurbo
You've got to be kidding, how many posts?
 
Posts: 10461
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 11:46 am
Location: Sydney

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#27  Postby RoyBoy302 » Fri May 06, 2016 4:26 pm

TwinTurbo wrote:
RX4some wrote:
Good point Rolf, blue flags and headlights on :idea:


Cheers
Gary


TwinTurbo wrote:The problem is Rolf moved over/allowed room to be overtaken, with the same closing speeds, and I don't think it's unreasonable for the over taker to expect the same to happen with the car next in the queue. I seem to remember this conversation was about "newbies" and this is a perfect example.


Cheers
Gary


Not trying to lay blame on anyone here BUT , Gary I do remember that the "correct" way , as instructed in all driver training is ................

Maintain your line and let the overtaking car go around you . It is the responsibility of the passing car to do that when and where it is safe.

Gary , when was the last time you "pulled over" going "full tilt" ( for that particular car ) entering and midway through the chase ???

Yes , thought so ...............
Cheers

Royboy

Anderson's Axiom
You can only be young once ,
but you can be immature forever
User avatar
RoyBoy302
forum freak
 
Posts: 1182
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:30 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#28  Postby TwinTurbo » Fri May 06, 2016 6:03 pm

RoyBoy302 wrote:
TwinTurbo wrote:
RX4some wrote:Good point Rolf, blue flags and headlights on :idea:

TwinTurbo wrote:The problem is Rolf moved over/allowed room to be overtaken, with the same closing speeds, and I don't think it's unreasonable for the over taker to expect the same to happen with the car next in the queue. I seem to remember this conversation was about "newbies" and this is a perfect example.
Not trying to lay blame on anyone here BUT , Gary I do remember that the "correct" way , as instructed in all driver training is ................
Maintain your line and let the overtaking car go around you . It is the responsibility of the passing car to do that when and where it is safe.
Gary , when was the last time you "pulled over" going "full tilt" ( for that particular car ) entering and midway through the chase ???
Yes , thought so ...............

Actually Roy it was early last year, ~275 kph through the chase, it drifts (mild understeer) to the left so I usually would straighten and brake whilst moving (very gently) to the right for the wide entry and late apex for the left hander. But there was an Audi R8 moving to the right of me, so I did the braking a little early and in a straight line ie; keeping a couple of car widths to the left of my normal line. Giving the Audi enough room to brake and take his normal line. I actually "maintained my line" and didn't move to the right to take a normal entry. Did my fastest time, so it didn't cost much. 8)

Cheers
Gary
User avatar
TwinTurbo
You've got to be kidding, how many posts?
 
Posts: 10461
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 11:46 am
Location: Sydney

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#29  Postby RoyBoy302 » Fri May 06, 2016 6:18 pm

What race was that in Gary ?
User avatar
RoyBoy302
forum freak
 
Posts: 1182
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:30 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#30  Postby TwinTurbo » Fri May 06, 2016 7:10 pm

RoyBoy302 wrote:What race was that in Gary ?

Drive day Roy, good fun, glad I wasn't paying though.

Cheers
Gary
User avatar
TwinTurbo
You've got to be kidding, how many posts?
 
Posts: 10461
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 11:46 am
Location: Sydney

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#31  Postby Andy San » Fri May 06, 2016 9:03 pm

gmontrack wrote:there is no "weeding out" of newbies Michael, actually trying to ensure that there are some given a chance to run :)


If this is the case why are we picking 'newbie' names out of a hat for only one of our states spots when the 'veterans' who have run previously are getting 5 out of the 6 spots allocated?

A good percentage of the newbies might be new to bathurst but by using that selection criteria it's ruling out quite a lot of competitive cars and drivers just because they havent been able to get in previously.
Andy.
User avatar
Andy San
old timer
 
Posts: 281
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:03 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#32  Postby gmontrack » Sat May 07, 2016 10:04 am

Hi Andy
The E of I form outlined how things are going to work so I'm sorry if that seems unfear but its a simple case of mathematics, there are 60 spots and over 100 people wanting to run so it is never going to work out for some.
I have made a point of trying to squeeze as many newbies on the grid as I can. Yes a couple of states where asked to pick a name from a list sorry if you missed out, but unfortunately that's what happens.

GM
gmontrack
old timer
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 4:48 pm
Location:

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#33  Postby Steve thomas » Sat May 07, 2016 11:22 am

Sadly not everyone has the States members best interests in mind. A set number of entries should go to each state and be drawn in a ballot.
Back to the Past for the Future.
User avatar
Steve thomas
You've got to be kidding, how many posts?
 
Posts: 4621
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:18 pm
Location: Perth WA

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#34  Postby full_noise » Sat May 07, 2016 11:24 am

So where is the entry list posted??
User avatar
full_noise
old timer
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 6:44 pm
Location:

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#35  Postby gmontrack » Sat May 07, 2016 12:47 pm

"Sadly not everyone has the States members best interests in mind. A set number of entries should go to each state and be drawn in a ballot."

Steve, that's just what I have done, gone back over the last 3 years and got an average and then used that as a guide for each state. But I'm not a fan of just drawing names out of a hat for this event and as such indicated that in the E of I form which states , some preference is given to those that have supported the event previously.
I understand that not everyone agrees which is okay but that is how it will be.

There will be no entry list until entry forms come out, people have paid and all is confirmed which will be several months away, as it has been in previous years.

GM
gmontrack
old timer
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 4:48 pm
Location:

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#36  Postby Andy San » Sun May 08, 2016 10:16 am

gmontrack wrote:"Sadly not everyone has the States members best interests in mind. A set number of entries should go to each state and be drawn in a ballot."

Steve, that's just what I have done, gone back over the last 3 years and got an average and then used that as a guide for each state. But I'm not a fan of just drawing names out of a hat for this event and as such indicated that in the E of I form which states , some preference is given to those that have supported the event previously.
I understand that not everyone agrees which is okay but that is how it will be.

There will be no entry list until entry forms come out, people have paid and all is confirmed which will be several months away, as it has been in previous years.

GM


Surely averaging out the entries received for the current year is a much more accurate way of dividing up who gets what. Going off previous entries doesn't take into account the growing number each year, nor will it ever change the allocated spots. SA had 12 eois this year if I'm not mistaken - how will that be taken into consideration next year when we still only have 6 spots available because that's all we were allocated this year?

Personally I think the entry form should be posted up on the ipra bathurst website, and only that site, at a given day and time which everyone has plenty of notice about when it will be.
That's how a lot of events which are oversubscribed for numbers seem to do it, and it works pretty well.
That way there's no expressions of interest and everyone submitting an entry pays a deposit on the spot and has a chance of getting in if they do it early enough.
Andy.
User avatar
Andy San
old timer
 
Posts: 281
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:03 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#37  Postby TwinTurbo » Sun May 08, 2016 12:19 pm

Realistically there's no 100% "fair" system of selecting competitors for a strictly limited field, which is what Bathurst is, there is no chance of expanding it. Someone, somewhere, somehow will have a perfectly valid argument that someone should have been included and/or someone should have been excluded. It is also worth keeping in mind that in order to get invited back next year IP has to turn on a good show and perhaps more importantly not stuff up the main game. This ultimately means reliability, making it through the weekend without big accidents that take hours to clean up and not spraying 10 litres of oil and/or coolant all across the mountain. IP wouldn't get invited back if we, say, started the weekend with 60 cars and ended up with 30 in the last race. Or if we delayed the start of Qualifying for the 12 Hour competitors because of a huge clean up exercise. That's why history is so important, being able to rely on the driver and their car. Hence the Promotor, based on the information at hand, making the best choices in the interests of everyone, not just for this year but the next year and the one after that.


Cheers
Gary
User avatar
TwinTurbo
You've got to be kidding, how many posts?
 
Posts: 10461
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 11:46 am
Location: Sydney

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#38  Postby RoyBoy302 » Mon May 09, 2016 9:03 am

TwinTurbo wrote:
RoyBoy302 wrote:What race was that in Gary ?

Drive day Roy, good fun, glad I wasn't paying though.

Cheers
Gary


Ahh so you weren't RACING ..................
User avatar
RoyBoy302
forum freak
 
Posts: 1182
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:30 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#39  Postby TwinTurbo » Mon May 09, 2016 10:01 am

RoyBoy302 wrote:
TwinTurbo wrote:
RoyBoy302 wrote:What race was that in Gary ?
Drive day Roy, good fun, glad I wasn't paying though.

Ahh so you weren't RACING ..................

Nope, just trying to keep the LM8 behind me, whilst not damaging a $150+K car, and trying to beat my best ever non slick lap time around the Mt. There were 6 cars with drivers that I didn't know pretty close together, so I had to use the rear vision mirrors. Some of the guys had trouble just seeing what was in front of them let alone what was behind or beside. That's where experience is important, which after all is what we were discussing and what you challenged my opinion on. I'm a firm believer in racing experience being very important at Bathurst, especially for people who perhaps haven't been lapped before by cars with huge speed differentials. Personally I wouldn't like to see rookies with almost zero experience getting a run in the Bathurst IP Challenge. Some people may consider that unfair on them, but I consider it unfair on the other competitors if something happens. Not just unfair for that race, or even that year but for years to come. That's just my opinion, which admittedly isn't worth much.


Cheers
Gary
User avatar
TwinTurbo
You've got to be kidding, how many posts?
 
Posts: 10461
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 11:46 am
Location: Sydney

Re: 2017 IPRA Bathurst Challenge

Post Number:#40  Postby Andy San » Mon May 09, 2016 10:08 am

TwinTurbo wrote:
RoyBoy302 wrote:
TwinTurbo wrote:
RoyBoy302 wrote:What race was that in Gary ?
Drive day Roy, good fun, glad I wasn't paying though.

Ahh so you weren't RACING ..................

Nope, just trying to keep the LM8 behind me, whilst not damaging a $150+K car, and trying to beat my best ever non slick lap time around the Mt. There were 6 cars with drivers that I didn't know pretty close together, so I had to use the rear vision mirrors. Some of the guys had trouble just seeing what was in front of them let alone what was behind or beside. That's where experience is important, which after all is what we were discussing and what you challenged my opinion on. I'm a firm believer in racing experience being very important at Bathurst, especially for people who perhaps haven't been lapped before by cars with huge speed differentials. Personally I wouldn't like to see rookies with almost zero experience getting a run in the Bathurst IP Challenge. Some people may consider that unfair on them, but I consider it unfair on the other competitors if something happens. Not just unfair for that race, or even that year but for years to come. That's just my opinion, which admittedly isn't worth much.


Cheers
Gary


And this is where the problem lies Gary, Just because someone hasn't raced at Bathurst before it doesn't make them a rookie with zero experience at racing.
History has shown that even the most experienced guys can make mistakes all on their own, such as Ray a couple of years ago.
Andy.
User avatar
Andy San
old timer
 
Posts: 281
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:03 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills

PreviousNext

Return to Upcoming Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest